From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: ada writing guide
Date: 2000/04/17
Message-ID: <8dfesh$fl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 612285917
References: <8d6jfu$f6b$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>
 <%wJJ4.740$%Y3.249597@news.pacbell.net> <8d82lq$4fp$1@hobbes2.crc.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 17 16:41:57 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-04-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8d82lq$4fp$1@hobbes2.crc.com>,
  "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
>
> <tmoran@bix.com> wrote in message
> news:%wJJ4.740$%Y3.249597@news.pacbell.net...
> > >understanding that ADA does not have strict code writing standard
such as
> > >the ANSI C standard. nobody has mentioned any standard for ADA code
> writing.
> >   Do you mean preferred style, or language definition?  The answers
> > people have posted to your question have assumed you meant style,
but
> > of course there is no strict style standard for C (if you know of
one,
> > please tell us), so perhaps you meant language definition.  If so,
> > what you want is the Ada Language Reference Manual (LRM).  Look for
a
> > link to it at www.adapower.com
>
> Have you ever looked at
> http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/GNU/standards_toc.html
>
> This provides a coding stabndard for C, which could be considered
"strict."
>
>

Perhaps. But I'm hard-pressed to come up with any C program I've ever
looked at that conforms to the following statement:

Please use underscores to separate words in a name, so that the Emacs
word commands can be useful within them. Stick to
lower case; reserve upper case for macros and enum constants, and for
name-prefixes that follow a uniform convention.

This is completely antithetical to the "hungarian" notation that I find
most commonly. The style used for old K&R C source ususally avoids
underscores as well.
--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.