From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb425f6e2a82939b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada compiler in BASIC?
Date: 2000/04/17
Message-ID: <8df1ou$hf0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 612206885
References: <8db57c$g94$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8dc7c2$j7f$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <2000Apr16.192006.1@eisner>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x32.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 17 12:58:11 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <2000Apr16.192006.1@eisner>,
  Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote:
> > It would not be too hard to write an Ada 83
> > compiler where the maximum line length (an
> > implementation dependent choice) was 2 :-)
>
> Are you proposing an implementation that accepted
> abbreviations for some of the longer common Ada words, like
> "end" ?

No, Ada compilers are not allowed to accept abbreviations.
That's the point, if you make the maximum line length 2, then
no valid programs can be written. All valid programs are
rejected as exceeding the maximum line length. In Ada 83
there were no requirements on maximum line length values,
so such a compiler is technically conformant to the standard :-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.