From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: ada writing guide Date: 2000/04/16 Message-ID: <8dd00c$caa$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 611912866 References: <8d1rso$bir$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8d1vhj$hdr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8d2hig$7e6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F5DF8C.1A01E5A4@utech.net> <8d4t07$o15$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F603FE.B0C3ED83@utech.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x39.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Apr 16 18:15:51 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Simon Wright wrote: > It is MUCH better to have a tool do the indentation for you > and all your colleagues so you can recognise one another's > work .. you > probably wouldn't like APEX, you have NO control over layout! > or casing, as far as I can tell! I agree tools that check for consistency can be helpful, but personally I find it intolerable for the editor to do ANYTHING for me that I don't type myself, it just inteferes with my thinking, and I type fast enough that typing speed is never a bottleneck. I realize that others have different tastes, but it is important for toolsets to accomodate both viewpoints. What we do in the GNAT project is to put syntax and format checks at the checkin interface. People use their own approaches to generating the sources. Some people do indeed like to use GLIDE and have everything automated, but we don't insist on this approach. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.