From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 X-Received: by 2002:a37:6ca:: with SMTP id 193mr23591090qkg.436.1613559054386; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:50:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:e4c4:: with SMTP id b187mr26446824ybh.92.1613559054208; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:50:54 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 02:50:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.211.137; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.211.137 References: <0997fa9b-c607-4c61-a8cb-3d3dc3ce3904n@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8dc52127-3627-4bc1-b4d5-31935c3a4a37n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: algorithm, two implementations that act the same, same type etc From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:50:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61363 List-Id: Thanks. The tension subsided a little. I got weirdly emotional, sorry. Your stories and teachings are enlightening, now I understand why some code would have more comments than actual code. Makes sense if I consider that the language grammar itself appears as mostly useless commentary for C people. I'll refactor stuff and you'll tell if that complies with your standard.