From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: ada writing guide Date: 2000/04/15 Message-ID: <8d9o3s$16e$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 611488040 References: <8d1rso$bir$2@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <8d6jfu$f6b$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Apr 15 12:42:37 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-04-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8d6jfu$f6b$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>, "Riyaz Mansoor" wrote: > > after reading a whole lot of replies (thanx) i have come to the > understanding that ADA does not have strict code writing standard such as > the ANSI C standard. nobody has mentioned any standard for ADA code writing. > just different formats that different people use. Clearly you have never read either standard. The claim that ANSI C has a strict code writing standard is one of the more amusing fantasy's to appear on this newsgroup in some time :-) My guess is that you have mistaken some local coding convention for C with the ANSI standard, which is quite a confusion! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.