From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,939bba6defed3e0d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: problem solved,
 but I don't know why (was: GNAT implementation bug)
Date: 2000/04/15
Message-ID: <8d9nla$kt$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 611485793
References: <8d7n1a$ee6@journal.concentric.net>
 <38F79277.84A3262E@averstar.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Apr 15 12:34:50 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38F79277.84A3262E@averstar.com>,
  Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> You seem to have been unlucky enough to bump into a compiler
> or run-time bug.


Sorry, I don't see any evidence at all here of any bug in the
compiler or the run time.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.