From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,791530e499e6a7f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Subject: Re: ada writing guide Date: 2000/04/14 Message-ID: <8d82lq$4fp$1@hobbes2.crc.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 611292788 References: <8d6jfu$f6b$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au> <%wJJ4.740$%Y3.249597@news.pacbell.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@crc.com X-Trace: hobbes2.crc.com 955747834 4601 198.175.145.56 (14 Apr 2000 21:30:34 GMT) Organization: CRC: A wholly owned subsidiary of Thermo Electron X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Apr 2000 21:30:34 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-14T21:30:34+00:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:%wJJ4.740$%Y3.249597@news.pacbell.net... > >understanding that ADA does not have strict code writing standard such as > >the ANSI C standard. nobody has mentioned any standard for ADA code writing. > Do you mean preferred style, or language definition? The answers > people have posted to your question have assumed you meant style, but > of course there is no strict style standard for C (if you know of one, > please tell us), so perhaps you meant language definition. If so, > what you want is the Ada Language Reference Manual (LRM). Look for a > link to it at www.adapower.com Have you ever looked at http://www.delorie.com/gnu/docs/GNU/standards_toc.html This provides a coding stabndard for C, which could be considered "strict."