From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9ace55b4f3fafd3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-08 08:44:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: oliderid@yahoo.co.uk (Olivier Laurent) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: a good book to start with? Date: 8 Oct 2003 08:44:07 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <8d63e22a.0310080744.2d292add@posting.google.com> References: <8d63e22a.0310070510.607bd55a@posting.google.com> <_jzgb.27856$kD3.4968@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <8d63e22a.0310080218.23ffb8be@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.78.150.138 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1065627847 19543 127.0.0.1 (8 Oct 2003 15:44:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:467 Date: 2003-10-08T08:44:07-07:00 List-Id: "Stephane Richard" wrote in message news:... > Me well I simply prefer Ada for more than one reason. Mainly because it > still detects more errors at compile time than Java can, which means that by > the time yoru code compiles, there's: > 1. a much higher change it will run > 2. a much smaller debugging time from the coding to the end of debugging > phase. Well I'ven't enough experience and knowledge to follow you on that way. But with my humble perspective...ADA is "much" easier to read than C++ family. Eh...I mean you just need to read it to understand what's going on. Olivier