From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00ff2b882a06fda X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: HELP: renames and enum values Date: 2000/04/13 Message-ID: <8d4t6r$oam$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 610721533 References: <38ECE0EB.4BD4A53E@mindspring.com> <38EE2019.4C91075D@Raytheon.com> <38EE494D.DDB9CE9@mindspring.com> <8cp1hd$3so$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8cqf1i$i72$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38F5D6F9.5B8892F2@bton.ac.uk> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Apr 13 16:38:54 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <38F5D6F9.5B8892F2@bton.ac.uk>, John English wrote: > Dale Stanbrough wrote: > > All i was attempting to say is that > > > > type blah renames bleh; > > > > could be predicted to have the same semantics as a subtype > > declaration (this would be the "other way" of performing > > subtyping). > > > > I know what beginners think of, because I had 8 years of > > teaching beginners. This is something that some of them > > thought of (but not many because most of them were introduced > > to subtypes long before renames!). > > What's even less obvious is the way to rename enumeration literals: > > function Enum_Literal return Enum_Type renames Other_Enum_Literal; > > Now, that *really* confuses them, and none of them would ever be > able to guess it without being told! What's wrong with: Enum_Literal : constant Enum_Type := Other_Enum_Literal; ? -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.