From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a36b7df69d1af90
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Announcing JGNAT public version 1.0p
Date: 2000/04/12
Message-ID: <8d190n$dg2$1@wanadoo.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 609999085
References: <8bqd8g$sbs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c2613$hce$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <sedi346n9138@corp.supernews.com> <8c7fh4$25g$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <sefra8s2eop75@corp.supernews.com> <8c92nl$nqn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <seg4ssgaeop7@corp.supernews.com> <8cak93$dtl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38EA152B.6D7A4481@earthlink.net>
 <1MNG4.630$n8.195854@news-east.usenetserver.com>
 <38ECB0CC.3B2941E2@earthlink.net> <8ckscp$nv7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8cs4ad$ft3$1@clnews.edf.fr> <8ct83j$ho3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 955524951 13826 164.138.227.160 (12 Apr 2000 07:35:51 GMT)
Organization: home
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2000 07:35:51 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-04-12T07:35:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


hugin777@my-deja.com a �crit dans le message
<8ct83j$ho3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <8cs4ad$ft3$1@clnews.edf.fr>,
>  "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@der.edf.fr> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks a lot !

You're welcome :)

>
>As you can imaging I feel a bit stupid. But what worries me even more is
>that the Java version still is consistently faster (but not so much any
>more) even with the same algorithm (even tried with various combinations
>of -O2, -O3, -gnatp, Component_Size=1,8,32 &c) !!
>  If Robert Dewar is right and it isn't caused by Pentium optimizations
>then IBM truly does magic ! How can it be faster when it has to be
>profiled, JIT'ed and _then_ run at full speed ?

Well, I don't have the full source right now, but I think that the time
computation
was inside the code so it compute only the time spent in the program not the
profile, JIT phase. Right ?

>
>Amazing... Or maybe I have overlooked something else.
>

See above.

Pascal.

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"