From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6ede9f13f1c33737
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marcelo_Cora=E7a_de_Freitas?= <marcelo.batera@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Toolchain of choice
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <8d06e2df-f928-4f49-8c9a-7b4655c99df4@r6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <ad1b1285-7d5c-4579-9830-05fd0edf0846@o14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <m2hbff7n0h.fsf@pushface.org>
 <0261f91c-d864-4eb9-b642-bd6bda4c34c9@i17g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
 <m239qy70hb.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.153.177.113
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1290174013 27771 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2010 13:40:13
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=200.153.177.113;
 posting-account=NclPyQoAAAAE3vS1fHd_8NOSumP9W3Ey
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Sabayon Chrome/7.0.517.41 Safari/534.7,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15613
Date: 2010-11-19T05:40:12-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Nov 18, 5:04=A0pm, Simon Wright <si...@pushface.org> wrote:
> Now, there would be no trouble using GNAT GPL 2010.

Awesome, but wouldn't the license when compiling with GNAT GPL infect
GNAT GCC?

I mean, gnat gcc is MGPL while gnat gpl is pure GPL.