From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f32236e7e55b02e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: Ada Queue Date: 2000/04/06 Message-ID: <8ciesn$4mt$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 607612482 References: <38eca724@news.hamilton.edu> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x26.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Apr 06 16:44:12 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-04-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <38eca724@news.hamilton.edu>, "Joseph T." wrote: > > Can anyone corroborate why I chose to make this enqueue function using > the passed pointer to Q instead of the temp pointer to loop through > the queue? Any suggestions, ideas, compliments, critiques are greatly > appreciated. Perhaps, if you were to tell me why you chose to do that. I can hardly corroborate something I don't know about. Perhaps you should rephrase the question? -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.