From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,27e95161b8834d15
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Character/Integer Conversion
Date: 2000/04/05
Message-ID: <8cg0ku$e37$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 607170644
References: <8c3a6e$q5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ca7k8$v2q$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8cajeh$css$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38EA18EE.1C3D9D2F@mail.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Apr 05 18:29:06 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <38EA18EE.1C3D9D2F@mail.com>,
  Mats Weber <matsw@mail.com> wrote:
> This should not be a problem anymore with Ada 95, as there is
an
> implementation advice saying that an array's 'Address should
point to
> the contents, not the dope.


Implementation advice is not a guarantee, and this particular
implementation advice is not practical in some implementation
environments.

It is not at ALL clear that this can apply to an address clause
anyway in an implementation which puts dope behind the array
(think about the consequences!)



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.