From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a36b7df69d1af90
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing JGNAT public version 1.0p
Date: 2000/04/03
Message-ID: <8cajsb$dhd$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 606131837
References: <8bqd8g$sbs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c2613$hce$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <sedi346n9138@corp.supernews.com> <8c7fh4$25g$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <sefra8s2eop75@corp.supernews.com> <8c92nl$nqn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <seg4ssgaeop7@corp.supernews.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 03 17:20:29 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-04-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <seg4ssgaeop7@corp.supernews.com>,
  "John Merryweather Cooper" <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net> wrote:

> BTW, since the Sun JDK is the "standard," isn't this really a
> bug issue for the M$ VM and not a failure of JGNAT?

It is only a behavioral standard, and not immune to bugs, so
one cannot be certain of this judgment. In practice not all
JVM's behave the same way in various marginal cases :-)
It would be nice if we could take this attitude, but from
a realistic point of view, it is not reasonable to do so!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.