From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,edad7a168517ff4e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: :-) A Brand-New Language! :-) Date: 2000/04/03 Message-ID: <8cai6u$bf6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 606118050 References: <38e56e47@excalibur.gbmtech.net> <38E636F9.D15710EA@quadruscorp.com> <38E638A4.D86E0725@quadruscorp.com> <38E7924F.FD170A14@quadruscorp.com> <8c8016$iqk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8c9saa$j79$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38e8ab71$1@excalibur.gbmtech.net> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x37.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Apr 03 16:51:50 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-04-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <38e8ab71$1@excalibur.gbmtech.net>, "John Herro" wrote: > but I think 2000-April-01 or 2000-Apr-01 is > just as unambiguous and easier to read. Yes, and Esperanto is easier to read than English :-) Computer people always like to try to change common usage in this way, but it won't work. The full form April 3, 2000 is still perfectly clear, and is actually the most common usage in many countries. I do not think you are about to change that :-) The US 4/3/2000 is simply to be understood as short hand for this longer form. As always, the format is not that critical, like endianness, it is the lack of a common standard that causes trouble. By the way, the idiot customs department in the US uses the European style for dates. naturally most americans fill out the form wrong :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.