From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,35f6cee6f665d64b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.88.5 with SMTP id bc5mr1394992pab.11.1343575872800;
        Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 c10ni48523pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada novice <shai.lesh@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions 20120712
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <8c7bea4a-a8c2-405c-be56-314e7159d670@googlegroups.com>
References: <m2k3y8ydap.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <167ecede-3588-45f0-904b-06a8be4cfec7@googlegroups.com>
 <m24npay65y.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <2ba72d4e-6e88-4900-8232-c075242dec1f@googlegroups.com>
 <65f76f80-a1e5-4c60-8002-45becc2a1198@googlegroups.com>
 <m2mx2kq5me.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <e1d5d31c-f873-4910-8bf3-6700a17007d1@googlegroups.com>
 <m2ehnvpto3.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <6ae0b4cc-5ef1-43c0-b93a-8d33408f1a77@googlegroups.com>
 <jv3gvj$k0p$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <00b425bc-6af1-4062-be58-f98012d155c6@googlegroups.com>
 <jv3imm$o6h$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.11.21.204
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343575872 22283 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2012 15:31:12
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nma@12000.org
In-Reply-To: <jv3imm$o6h$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.11.21.204;
 posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-07-29T08:31:12-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:52:08 PM UTC+1, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:

> Sorry, I misunderstood you. somehow I read what you said as the
>=20
> eigenvalues were different.
>=20

No worries :)

Now I realised that I earlier wrote: "Something would have been terribly wr=
ong had the eigenvalues were different!". Of course this is not grammatical=
ly correct and this may have confused you. I wanted to say: "Something woul=
d have been terribly wrong had the eigenvalues been different!". Sorry for =
this slip of mine.

YC