From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,af0c6ea85f3ed92d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.226.10 with SMTP id ro10mr6568182pbc.6.1329001664030; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:07:44 -0800 (PST) Path: wr5ni13924pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v6g2000pba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Shea Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Arbitrary Sandbox Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:05:47 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <8c4897a5-430a-4670-b0b7-9825b2ba72f0@v6g2000pba.googlegroups.com> References: <8e83f2be-c6e9-4b0b-b53c-d50fe70d01e1@pq6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <702c5d55-ff96-486c-bff9-93aa273f6217@i18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <1sqnritpwwaip.43b7b5fci9nw.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.76.94.142 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1329001663 32056 127.0.0.1 (11 Feb 2012 23:07:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v6g2000pba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=114.76.94.142; posting-account=3Ly23AoAAABzcQBzLiIXe1WPOFNRSfDG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALENKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-02-11T15:05:47-08:00 List-Id: I agree. However, this is all getting off point now and I think I have enough information to properly moderate the debate. Thank you all for the help! On Feb 12, 8:38=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:15:12 -0800 (PST), Maciej Sobczak wrote: > > On 11 Lut, 12:39, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" > > wrote: > I think that VM is yet another distraction (like firewalls, anti-virus > software are) rather that a solution of safety problems of existing OSes > and protocols. > > -- > Regards, > Dmitry A. Kazakovhttp://www.dmitry-kazakov.de