From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:a089:: with SMTP id o131-v6mr455356ite.10.1523389578164; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:46:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4807:: with SMTP id c7-v6mr105404otf.1.1523389577906; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feed.usenet.farm!feeder3.feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!k65-v6no2831345ita.0!news-out.google.com!15-v6ni1643itg.0!nntp.google.com!k65-v6no2831342ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:46:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: <1b44444f-c1b3-414e-84fb-8798961487c3@googlegroups.com> <62ee0aac-49da-4925-b9aa-a16695b3fc45@googlegroups.com> <9879872e-c18a-4667-afe5-41ce0f54559f@googlegroups.com> <80db2d05-744f-4201-ba1b-4436f8040491@googlegroups.com> <59f9ab6d-d6ba-45ff-a6f0-c5699983d9e8@googlegroups.com> <1a390e22-f49f-4028-8e58-ca4d0f51e4b6@googlegroups.com> <195739aa-2f32-4cba-80ac-e60591e94712@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8c44fc67-2183-42d8-a61e-8a15ce2ba44c@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Interesting article on ARG work From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:46:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51432 Date: 2018-04-10T12:46:17-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 2:23:24 PM UTC-5, Niklas Holsti wrote: > For a GLR parser, >=20 > _just_ a GLR parser > > _just_ GLR parsing. > > In plain GLR parsing > > That is true for the "Fork-Merge LR" (FMLR) parsing in the paper you=20 > referenced, but that is not GLR. > > _just_ a GLR=20 Which flavor of generalized LR are you taking as the sole seminal reference= to definitively brand the official =E2=80=9Cjust GLR=E2=80=9D and =E2=80= =9Cplain GLR=E2=80=9D? There are 2 seminal references historically: Berna= rd Lang (1974) and Tomita Masaru (1985). Lang's versus Tomita's 2 approach= es to GLR are substantially different.