From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,de8312f092ea7867
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: YACT (Yet Another C Trap)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <8c1b1776-6293-4663-ae65-32c667c3acc3@s15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <338f4d05-5b3b-47bd-bff8-76c1488eae6d@x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
 <c02d8eee-bf6f-406e-8d24-f741798c7e11@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008301014490.28149@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1283154746 10871 127.0.0.1 (30 Aug 2010 07:52:26
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:52:26 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236;
 posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Firefox/3.6.7,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13838
Date: 2010-08-30T00:52:26-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 30 Sie, 10:21, stefan-lu...@see-the.signature wrote:

> I tried it out. The above example gives an error. But the following
> program compiles without warnings with gcc:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main (int argc, char **argv)
> { float x;
>
> =A0 =A0 x =3D 12,3;

> Is this a language flaw of C, or a bug in gcc?

It is a language flaw for two reasons: one is that the language should
not allow you to initialize floating-point values with integers and
the other is that the comma operator for fundamental types is nonsense
[*]. :-)

[*] But there are quite nice ways to use it for custom types.

In any case, the above code violates the coding standard that
discourages the use of unnamed numeric constants. Constants should be
named (with notable exception of 0 and 1), which would bring you back
to compile-time error. You might still argue that the need for such a
coding standard indicates a flaw in the language anyway.

Note that the above problem has many more interesting implications,
especially when combined with other flaws:

float f =3D 10.0f;

f =3D f * 1,5;

Go figure what it does (and I can bet that your guess will be
wrong). ;-)

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com

YAMI4 - Messaging Solution for Distributed Systems
http://www.inspirel.com/yami4