From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f4d16c4ee371eb5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jean-Marc Bourguet Subject: Re: Why is it Called a Package? Date: 2000/03/30 Message-ID: <8c07vc$eta$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 604451226 References: <38DF7F38.8D656ABD@lmtas.lmco.com> <38DFB0BC.9FF72EFC@callnetuk.com> <87u2hq857e.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <38E2A4A4.E59E997C@research.canon.com.au> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 213.44.45.100 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Mar 30 18:55:49 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDbourguet Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.38 i586) Date: 2000-03-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > Geoff Bull writes: > > > Isn't it a little bit late to be arguing about this? > [notation for ".all"] > > Only if you think Ada 95 is the final word in programming language > design. ;-) > > Of course I don't think anybody's going to change the syntax of Ada at > this point. But I still find it fun to discuss language design issues, > and if the issues involve variations on Ada, they seem on-topic enough > to be posted here. I understand that such discussions might be boring > to those who just want to *use* the language as it is. Is there a place where language design issues is the main topic? -- Jean-Marc Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.