From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever!
Date: 2000/03/25
Message-ID: <8bja4f$in6$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 602353029
References: <38D7B41D.B3494C6A@lmco.com> <38D7B83B.27DC06C8@earthlink.net>
 <8b8fha$m1h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <TnVB4.10961$624.1043257@news.flash.net>
 <38D8EAC1.2563A49C@quadruscorp.com> <yecu2hwgakn.fsf@king.cts.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 25 Mar 2000 21:12:47 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-25T21:12:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <yecu2hwgakn.fsf@king.cts.com>,
	Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com> wrote:

>The name Intercal, of course, stands for "Compiler Language With No
>Pronounceable Acronym".
>
>But Malbolge is much much worse.

I personally prefer the DWIM language.  All problems are solved with
no errors, there is never a run-time error, and one can define fuzzy
requirements at any point in the development or maintenance lifecycle.

DWIM = Do What I Mean.

Richard Riehle