From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,14f7200925acb579 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: No Go To's Forever! Date: 2000/03/22 Message-ID: <8barht$4u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 600892328 References: <38D7B41D.B3494C6A@lmco.com> <38D8E9DE.14E93706@quadruscorp.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x36.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 22 16:15:10 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <38D8E9DE.14E93706@quadruscorp.com>, "Marin D. Condic" wrote: > Don't fight the language! Learn to do it "The Ada Way" Last I looked, Ada included a goto statement, it is people who absolutely forbid goto's who are failing to follow the above advice. The Ada way is to use a goto if and only if it improves the readability and maintainability of the code. Yes, you can argue that there are zero such cases, but obviously many programmers and the designers of the Ada language disagree with you :-) Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.