From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d342f2360cfae987 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: what is happening here? (access types & discriminants...) Date: 2000/03/21 Message-ID: <8b6u5f$huv$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 600244435 References: <8b2hql$ekn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x34.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Mar 21 04:34:56 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-03-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dale@cs.rmit.edu.au (Dale Stanbrough) wrote: > Does the declartion cause the pointer to only be able to point > at arrays from 1..100? yes > If so I didn't know you could constrain > pointers in such a way. It is a standard Ada 83 feature ... Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.