From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebc19d379b37caae X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Type size vs. actual size difference. Date: 2000/03/20 Message-ID: <8b5n8c$kkl$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 600000667 References: <8b5hhp$pvv1@svlss.lmms.lmco.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x40.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Mar 20 17:30:52 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-03-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Vladimir Olensky" wrote: > Topic name was: Size (novice question). (not relevant stuff snipped) Vladimir, you translated 214 bytes into 214 bits in your reading, and thus answered a completely different question! Many are puzzled by this discrepancy between type'size and object'size, even though it is perfectly in accordance with the RM (and indeed is expected behavior). We find that quite a bit of our support effort involves helping people deal with these kinds of problems (the first step is to find out what the underlying intention is). Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.