From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,39579ad87542da0e X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.224.130.195 with SMTP id u3mr2639423qas.1.1367282495739; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:41:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.126.10 with SMTP id mu10mr573003igb.15.1367282495657; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Path: ef9ni35280qab.0!nntp.google.com!s14no970616qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:41:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.20.190.126; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8b517bcc-c85a-413a-abd3-1f232f764473@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Seeking for papers about tagged types vs access to subprograms From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:41:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2013-04-29T17:41:35-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, April 29, 2013 6:31:37 PM UTC-6, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) wro= te: >=20 > Same question in the context of `Ada.Finalization`. Similar semantic coul= d =20 > have been made available without requiring tagged types. This is true; but it's likely that tagged-types were the easiest method to = implement it.