From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1978d1b5655cacb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Announcing GNAT version 3.13
Date: 2000/03/18
Message-ID: <8b0pi9$as7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 599115114
References: <8ao4bn$jib$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8ao4s3$jvn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8at5uh$m2o3@ftp.kvaerner.com> <8atfpu$hb1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <8au3t0$n854@ftp.kvaerner.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x28.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Mar 18 20:39:40 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-03-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8au3t0$n854@ftp.kvaerner.com>,
  "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei.jensen@kvaerner.com> wrote:
> There are no problems with o32, which I think the previous
> versions of GNAT generated. The problem with gcc exists with
> the n32 stuff.

SGI has been distributing n32 conforming implementations of
GNAT for some time. So my comments were of course with respect
to n32, since that is what your question was about. I repeat
that we know of no "major problems" in this area, and none
have been reported to us, or, as far as we are aware, to SGI.

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Tecnologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.