From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7ea1cb7a2beb2ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: claveman@fern.com (Charles H. Sampson)
Subject: Re: Disallowing Pre-Defined Operations
Date: 2000/03/15
Message-ID: <8ang7v$peo$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 597713427
Distribution: world
References: <8a9eeg$qtv$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil> <8ababr$c3u$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <38CA05AF.7E77790D@online.no>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@newpoisson.nosc.mil
X-Trace: newpoisson.nosc.mil 953107519 26072 128.49.4.5 (15 Mar 2000 08:05:19
 GMT)
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Mar 2000 08:05:19 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-15T08:05:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

James S. Rogers wrote:
>Why not simply declare the type private or limited private, then provide
>your
>own versions for all the required operators?
     
     Because, as I said in my original post, the types are inherently
numeric and I don't want to lose the ability to use numeric literals.

				Charlie



--
******

     For an email response, my user name is "sampson" and my host
is "spawar.navy.mil".