From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7ea1cb7a2beb2ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Disallowing Pre-Defined Operations
Date: 2000/03/15
Message-ID: <8an0nu$r2v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 597631383
References: <8a9eeg$qtv$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil> <8ababr$c3u$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <38CA05AF.7E77790D@online.no> <8ajeji$896$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <yec4saah40n.fsf@king.cts.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 15 03:40:47 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-03-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <yec4saah40n.fsf@king.cts.com>,
  Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com> wrote:
> The usage is guaranteed to work, but judging from
> the wording in the RM I don't believe it's consistent with the
> original intent.  (I'm not saying I have a better idea.)

It may be more reliable to judge by being there :-)

The usage for restricting use of operations as discussed in
this thread, was definitely intended!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.