From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7ea1cb7a2beb2ee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei.jensen@kvaerner.com>
Subject: Re: Disallowing Pre-Defined Operations
Date: 2000/03/13
Message-ID: <8aia0k$csf6@ftp.kvaerner.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 596769386
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <8a9eeg$qtv$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil>
 <8ababr$c3u$1@wanadoo.fr><8afhed$f9v$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil>
 <wcc8zzop2ib.fsf@world.std.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0
Organization: Kv�rner Group IT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert A Duff wrote:
>Such a pragma (whether language-defined or implementation-defined) would
>be in extremely bad taste, IMHO.  Pragmas should not have a strong
>effect on the high-level semantics of the language.


I would think that pragmas would be an ideal way to explore such a
functionality. If they were useful, then it would be apropriate to extend the
language.


Greetings,