From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,334f9012742e58fc
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Phil Clayton <phil.clayton@lineone.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat GPL 2010 available soon (conditional expressions)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 15:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <8ac6b8d6-f4c0-4a8b-b3aa-ff6f2d136544@k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <2010061621145016807-sjs@essexacuk>
 <op.veihbktxnfgb3u@richard.piraten.dd>
	<0fa4c574-9539-492f-8514-d32c68beb22a@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<1frrgtpa5dycl$.12kl72iqsg3dx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c270613$0$6974$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<1wuwvzgwlwgli$.1birkinieia0d$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <f1a86f31-598c-4cb1-a60e-011da55f5feb@x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<1ur19ais2ejih.mjbgdsv9pr66.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c275562$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<4c276114$0$2378$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <i0dhh3$qh7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<i0e5uc$o4s$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <7ec98a71-edcb-4851-87fd-6702fb963829@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
	<d66a76c6-5409-409f-85d5-5508aaf9eb41@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<xtiljxug4bhh.urxhi8xkn4fw.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.110.199.193
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278370061 7749 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2010 22:47:41
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 22:47:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.110.199.193;
	posting-account=v7gx3AoAAABfjb9m5b7l_Lt2KVEgQBIe
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.15)
	Gecko/2009102704 Fedora/3.0.15-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.15,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12204
Date: 2010-07-05T15:47:41-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jul 5, 2:12=A0pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Phil Clayton wrote:
> > In my view, condition expressions are a step in the right direction...
> > but I'm the sort of person who wants to write an array aggregate like
>
> > =A0 (for I in 1 .. 5 =3D> (for J in 1 .. 7 =3D> (if I =3D J then 1.0 el=
se
> > 0.0)))
>
> =A0 (for I in 1..5 =3D> (for J in 1..7 =3D> Float (Boolean'Pos (I =3D J))=
))

Yep, I should have seen that one coming straight back... and taken
steps to avoid it :)

Phil