From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f36545ebe2d5763
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: ObjectAda and Feb 29th
Date: 2000/03/08
Message-ID: <8a6f1u$5l3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 594854030
References: <368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>
 <f5cobssumlck3tr1b5hve88a8tlgmu0dfa@4ax.com> <89j9vq$lvp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38c463df@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <t7ln3un337.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x35.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 08 21:00:49 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-03-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <t7ln3un337.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>,
  Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com> wrote:
> "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> writes:
> > Of course, it would be interesting to live to the year 2400,
just to see if
> > the C++ standard has stabilized by then.
>
> The C++ Standard is already stabilized. It's ISO/IEC 14882.
> It was approved by ANSI on 7/27/98.

Well clearly Nick knows that the ANSI C++ standard has been
issued, otherwise he would not be wondering whether it was
stablized. Perhaps (not at all unreasonably) he is wondering
whether this standard is stable. Since almost no one exactly
implements all of it yet, the question seems reasonable :-)



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.