From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-16 04:28:34 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: martin.m.dowie@ntlworld.com (Martin Dowie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community
Date: 16 Apr 2002 04:28:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <8a63570b.0204160328.de7bf8d@posting.google.com>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CBAFFEE.2080708@snafu.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.138.254.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018956514 17132 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2002 11:28:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2002 11:28:34 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22596
Date: 2002-04-16T11:28:34+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> - What needs to be standarized?
> 
>    This was interesting, only a view reactions related to
>    what is missing. I thinks this point contains the
>    key to the unserstanding of the relativly static
>    Ada community. Maybe there is not so mutch to do?
> 
>    Personally i am interested not so mutch in the lagnuage
>    but in extending the predefined lanaguage environment.

An interesting quote from Bjarne Stroustrup on his web page on
what he thinks C++0X should be, is:

"My personal view is that the key principles should be

 no major changes to the language itself 
 major extensions to the standard library"

We are not alone... :-)