From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f62556e56c9683 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: 'with'ing and 'use'ing Date: 2000/03/06 Message-ID: <8a1evn$hlm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 594011934 References: <38BC2EB3.2639372B@acm.org> <89l6aj$s5e$1@wanadoo.fr> <1e6xw1b.crkgd5nhvbzuN%claveman@inetworld.net> <8a0hio$qos$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8a0iam$r8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x38.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Mar 06 23:29:02 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-03-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <8a0iam$r8a$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > Hmmm. It occurs to me that it would actually be far easier to write a > tool that can hide or show leading package names upon user request. You > don't need any fancy compiler interface or even compiling code to do > that. You do need a compiler interface for a dotifier, since you need to know what package things come from. The ali information is certainly convenient for writing this tool. The undotifier is harder since it has to know about potential ambiguities. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.