From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8623fab5750cd6aa X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s53.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C," Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <40b9c99e$0$268$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <40ba315a$0$254$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk> <04udnR-eHNChzSbdRVn-vw@gbronline.com> <7J0xc.7371$8k4.269106@news20.bellglobal.com> <1086630278.542788@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <8xlxc.27603$sS2.845496@news20.bellglobal.com> <1086715817.122983@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1086733411.736049@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3Auxc.11998$XY6.1296622@read2.cgocable.net> <40C85035.4020706@noplace.com> <40CA0032.3010103@noplace.com> <40CAF0E1.4000904@noplace.com> Subject: Re: Ada BIND was: Improving Ada's image - Was: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: <8XCyc.31755$HG.29399@attbi_s53> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s53 1087044420 24.147.74.171 (Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:47:00 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:47:00 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:47:01 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1426 Date: 2004-06-12T12:47:01+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" wrote in message news:40CAF0E1.4000904@noplace.com... > While I'm a believer in Ada, I don't think that coding an app up in Ada > somehow makes it *better* just by that very fact. Nobody buys programs > just because it says "Ada Inside" - so its important to add something > more. Given limited resources, it would seem more productive to come up > with something new and innovative rather than take existing apps and > recode them in Ada just to have an Ada version. > While I generally agree with this sentiment, it is thinking "like" this that would prevent someone from doing something crazy like "I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things)." Which is how Linus announced he was starting Linux. Of course I have seen hundres of similarly bold announcements by software people over the years that go nowhere. I think us bitter old men are just too cynical sometimes....It comes from experience of course...but who knows..maybe this Ada bind thing will really get completed and be good....