From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx15.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <3bf7907b-2265-4314-a693-74792df531d1@googlegroups.com>
 <wccha40e9zh.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <lmpcc6$ivv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <op.xhvthnm6ule2fv@cardamome> <op.xhvtmbxlule2fv@cardamome>
In-Reply-To: <op.xhvtmbxlule2fv@cardamome>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <8SKpv.25283$CO1.5252@fx15.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:51:16 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:51:15 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1722
X-Received-Body-CRC: 244800954
X-Original-Bytes: 1949
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187182
Date: 2014-06-22T18:51:15-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 22-Jun-14 18:43, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:
> Le Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:40:25 +0200, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
> <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> a écrit:
>
>> Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 11:13:46 +0200, Nasser M. Abbasi <nma@12000.org> a
>> écrit:
>>> Even though some dynamic languages will not let one at run
>>> time mix apples and oranges, and will give run-time error,
>>> I'd rather know at compile time that I am not mixing apples
>>> with oranges. That is much more safe.
>>
>> Which ones? Dynamic in which ways?
>>
>
> Forget the question, I miss‑understood your words (I read it as if there
> was some dynamic languages able to not allow to mix apples and oranges,
> dot).

IIRC, Lisp's Error-handling can ensure that types are consistent, even 
though the language itself is dynamically typed.