From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9f27bbe0678fdfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: cts@kampong.aedinc.net ((null)) Subject: Re: huge executable?? Date: 2000/05/18 Message-ID: <8KUU4.12$341.446@newsfeed.slurp.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 625042462 References: <391E09C3.FA04871E@mailandnews.com> <3920DA5B.2F56@club-internet.fr> <8fpu0g$a3e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Summary: You gotta think small to be small X-Trace: newsfeed.slurp.net 958666756 208.4.231.188 (Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:16 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:16 CDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > >I'm developing for Systems with 8 MB RAM and 64 kb RAM. Shouldn't be a problem. In a previous life I developed programs with gnat 3.10 (the plain old public release) targeted to the i386 that fit into 8KB executable. You just have to be _very_ picky about what you let the linker bring in. -- ======================================================================= Life is short. | Craig Spannring Bike hard, ski fast. | cts@internetcds.com --------------------------------+------------------------------------