From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,561ac97c34d8f8ef X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-22 07:47:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!diablo.voicenet.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OT-spam detection, was Re: WM, and lindens rustled Date: 22 Jan 2004 09:47:19 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <8IZuR8u$Sd37@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <100tknotk84nfe0@corp.supernews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1074786371 9574 192.135.80.34 (22 Jan 2004 15:46:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4653 Date: 2004-01-22T09:47:19-06:00 List-Id: In article , Preben Randhol writes: > On 2004-01-22, Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> >> For improvement of the Internet, it is better to reject such connections >> at the SMTP level, or best of all engage in teergrubing/tarpitting. Such >> are typically done based on DNSbls of the email administrator's choice. > > Well, since it isn't done I would suspect this approach isn't working. Stop over to news.admin.net-abuse.email to see all the complaints from those whose email is rejected.