From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,557136a92a6a20c7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Joe Wisniewski <wisniew@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Do you do ASIS?
Date: 2000/03/04
Message-ID: <89s59o$unj$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 593222192
References: <89p2js$st2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <VyXv4.2560$w9.46549@news.pacbell.net> <89pkls$abk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x26.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 192.91.146.34
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Mar 04 23:12:58 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDwisniew
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en]C-AtHome0404 (Win98; U)
Date: 2000-03-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <89pkls$abk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Joe Wisniewski <wisniew@acm.org> wrote:
> In article <VyXv4.2560$w9.46549@news.pacbell.net>,
>   tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> > > Which vendor's compiler?  That is ultimately the question.
> >
> >   I don't understand.  Shouldn't a program that makes ASIS calls
> > to fetch information work identically regardless of whose
> > compiler, or whose ASIS implementation, it is calling?  (Not that
> > there seem to be all that many choices...)  Or are you talking
> > about efficiency and ease of use?
> >
>
>    In an ideal world, yes. The point is that not all of the vendors
>    support ASIS (especially the ASIS 2.0 interface for Ada95).
>    So, which vendor you use is critical to the answer to the question.
>
>    ACT has implemented pretty much all of the 2.0 interface including
>    the Data Decomposition package. OCS is working on this. Rational
>    has several versions of ASIS depending on whether you are using
>    Ada83 or Ada95. The last time that I talked to someone at
>    DDC-I or RR, they had no plans on rolling to the 2.0 spec.
>
>    AFAIK, no other vendors have plans on implementing
>    the 2.0 interface (although some support the 1.0 interface at
>    various levels.)

     I believe Aonix also has the 2.0 interface, but I believe that
     that they don't have the data decomposition annex. Sorry, Steve,
     didn't mean to slight you guys.

     Joe

>    , for various reasons, I suppose. Some are
>    supporting their customers needs for ASIS tools directly, some
>    don't see a market, some .... I don't know. (I'm not intentionally
>    leaving anyone's products out of this discussion. Please chime in.)
>
>    This all goes to the core of my original post.
>
> Joe
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.