From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38d8b4bd1cb45ff
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: choice of fixed point type
Date: 2000/03/04
Message-ID: <89rour$jak$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 593166947
References: <zGgv4.124$zz5.13407@news.pacbell.net>
 <9vTv4.603$zz5.39941@news.pacbell.net>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 4 Mar 2000 19:42:19 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-04T19:42:19+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9vTv4.603$zz5.39941@news.pacbell.net>,
	tmoran@bix.com wrote:

>I asked:
>>   Is <universal real> / <integer> always treated as a call on
>>function "/"(Left : Standard.Duration; Right : Integer)
>>return Standard.Duration;  ?
>  It turns out that was merely a problem with a single compiler.
>Three out of four compilers said the division was ambiguous.

Keeping us in suspense, Tom?  Which three gave you the good information?  Which
one got it wrong?   Eager minds want to know.  :-)

Richard Riehle