From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ef0d02be0b7b7f14,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: homo or hetero
Date: 2000/03/01
Message-ID: <89j0hp$fl3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 591714114
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x43.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 195.243.118.226
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 01 11:56:42 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDokellogg
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.04Gold (X11; I; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
Date: 2000-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <89i5vb$tqp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

> [...], but what possible effect can it have on the use of the
> DSA whether you decide to call this situation homogenous or
> heterogenous?

The confusion stems from the Annex E implementation
permission that

"An implementation may require that the set of processing
 nodes of a distributed system be homogeneous."

The operating system (e.g. Linux vs. Linux/RT) *should*
have no effect on the definition of "homogeneous" ?

-- Oliver
-- okellogg at freenet dot de


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.