From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,532297d692a0f5f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Homo or hetero
Date: 2000/03/01
Message-ID: <89i5vb$tqp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 591604555
References: <38B2349E.83438A36@celsiustech.se> <89eda6$7vn$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <89ee5l$8in$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <89fol9$6nr$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x35.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Mar 01 04:23:10 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I)
Date: 2000-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <89fol9$6nr$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Okay, I guess those spoiled by the joys of CORBA could call
> the addressing of heterogeneousness by the DSA "unimportant"
>  :-)

Sorry, I am still completely confused. I know there is a smiley
there, but what possible effect can it have on the use of the
DSA whether you decide to call this situation homogenous or
heterogenous? Sure you have to check that your vendor's
implementation of Annex E will handle this combination, but
since so far the only implementation of Annex E is GNAT, and
GNAT handles heterogenous cases as easily as homogenous cases,
even if the architectures involved are very different (unlike
this case), that observation is academic!

Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.