From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2f62556e56c9683 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ted Dennison Subject: Re: 'with'ing and 'use'ing Date: 2000/02/29 Message-ID: <89hclg$cbq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 591455403 References: X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x23.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 29 21:11:16 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) Date: 2000-02-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff wrote: > rh@signal.dera.gov.uk (Roger Hoyle) writes: > The trick is a little bit dangerous, because the code in the Ops > package is so boring that the reader assumes it says the obvious, > without reading it carefully. I remember spending some time tracking > down a bug caused by saying something like ``function "xor"(...) > renames "and";'' -- a cut-and-paste error. I can vouch from personal experience that the *other* Ada83 trick (renaming the functions) is succeptable to that exact same bug. :-( -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.