From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f36545ebe2d5763
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: ObjectAda and Feb 29th
Date: 2000/02/29
Message-ID: <89gpl5$tpq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 591328068
References: <368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x30.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 29 15:46:46 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-02-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>,
  Roger@natron.demon.co.uk wrote:
>
> I've hit a problem with the special edition of the ObjectAda product
> from Aonix (version 7.1.105, running under Win 95) which I mention on
> the off chance it hasn't already been discussed here.

It hasn't, but it came up in the Intel-OA mailing list (
"intel-objectada" <intel-objectada@sf.aonix.com> ) nearly 2 years ago.

> I don't know whether this is specific to ObjectAda, or is a side
effect

It's an OA (pre 7.1.3) problem.

See my post in another topic about this. There is a patch available at
http://www.aonix.com/Support/Ada/Patches/1102-patches.htm#1102V712-U4

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.