From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e3feb606f668a7c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert Dewar Subject: Re: Why should hackers love Ada. (Re: Ada 95 based RTOS) Date: 2000/02/26 Message-ID: <897k3c$qgg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 590135406 References: <88ilp7$bcm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38ADCA44.3B91BF6F@averstar.com> <88qli0$gvr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38B2A2A1.FDCDDFE7@honeywell.com> <88ugrd$7j7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <890ght$bih1@ftp.kvaerner.com> <38B3EA94.E3AB4929@maths.unine.ch> <38B41432.88D7389F@quadruscorp.com> <38B47521.1A80B6A1@lmtas.lmco.com> <38B55928.8A0EAB06@quadruscorp.com> <2000Feb24.122253.1@eisner> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x33.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Feb 26 04:16:47 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; I) Date: 2000-02-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > > Gary wrote: > >> I see this reference to ADA being good at bit twiddling, periodically. > >> Virtually all high-level languages provide facilities for bit twiddling. Sure, but the facilities in Ada are far more powerful, allow more control, and most importantly, provide a much better level of abstraction. For example, packed bit arrays are a powerful feature missing from C. Sure you can program this yourself in C, but it is messy, error prone, and results in ugly and possibly inefficient code. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.