From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8087:: with SMTP id
 k7-v6mr10727110ioi.103.1525271672051;
        Wed, 02 May 2018 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4814:: with SMTP id
 c20-v6mr1446683otf.6.1525271671927;
 Wed, 02 May 2018 07:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.214.87.MISMATCH!f199-v6no345333itd.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni5658itb.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no919247itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 07:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fkrgsoFblsmU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83d7:a56b:196e:ceb1:d8bc:380a;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83d7:a56b:196e:ceb1:d8bc:380a
References: <pavkou$1go7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pavm21$ko5$1@dont-email.me>
 <pavmla$1k1o$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pavp2a$81n$1@dont-email.me>
 <pavqa6$1qdj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pbr405$lg5$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <pbs4km$doq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pbtjlf$k6q$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <pbuk07$9mf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pc03h3$e9d$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <pc1bok$iqf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <a4afa3d7-5057-4b01-9ac0-87fde248f5aa@googlegroups.com>
 <pc56s0$o1i$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <3b736ddf-0807-4781-a973-6164280faae7@googlegroups.com>
 <pc7hk3$tpt$1@dont-email.me>
 <f675667c-51cf-4a29-8cee-6f526da04cca@googlegroups.com>
 <pc9iea$p7s$1@dont-email.me> <fkrgsoFblsmU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <894f8f3f-1713-4a75-9322-262a4eb1ecb6@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Finalization of library level tasks
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 14:34:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51916
Date: 2018-05-02T07:34:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2018 17:54:02 UTC+2 schrieb Niklas Holsti:
> On 18-05-01 14:18 , Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> > On 05/01/2018 11:17 AM, AdaMagica wrote:
> >>
> >> But he is correct on this example you gave: With redispatch, OP(X) and
> >> OP(Parent'Class(X)) are not the same.
> >
> > If you use redispatching then you get what you deserve.
> 
> Which can be exactly what you want to achieve!
> 
> (Obligatory dissenting voice in favour of occasional redispatching, to 
> avoid the appearance that redispatching is universally abhorred.)

Yes, there are situations where redispatching is essential. I've once come into this situation.

But I would say, do not use redispatch in Initialize, Adjust, Finalize. This is strong advice. Think thrice if you think you need it.