From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!COMMUNITY-CHEST.MITRE.ORG!tsmith From: tsmith@COMMUNITY-CHEST.MITRE.ORG Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Use of "is separate" and compilation efficiency Message-ID: <8911201444.AA15697@chance.mitre.org> Date: 20 Nov 89 14:44:49 GMT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet List-Id: The MITRE Washington Software center is working on a project which is concerned with the compilation time of some Ada code. A factor being considered (as having a possible impact on the required compilation time) is the use of 'is separates'. We are looking for input from other software engineers who have made decisions concerning the Ada 'is separate' capability in the design and implementation of their code. In particular, we are interested in learning about any guidelines or established practices, within a project, that deal with 'is separate' and/or related issues. Thanks in advance. +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Thomas J. Smith........... INTERNET: tsmith@community-chest.mitre.org | | The MITRE Corporation..... PHONE: (703) 883-7992 | | 7525 Colshire Drive....... FAX: (703) 883-5519 | | McLean VA 22102........... | | MAILSTOP Z645............. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+