From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!apple!agate!ucbvax!COMMUNITY-CHEST.MITRE.ORG!howell From: howell@COMMUNITY-CHEST.MITRE.ORG Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: compilation performance figures for real systems Message-ID: <8907241341.AA05397@boardwalk.mitre.org> Date: 24 Jul 89 13:41:51 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet List-Id: Benchmarks and samples notwithstanding, what kinds of actual Ada compiler throughput (stmts per elapsed minute) are you finding for real projects with large amounts of Ada code? I understand that framing the question this way doesn't accomodate results for incremental compilation systems (e.g., Biin, R1000), but I'm primarily interested in results for "traditional" Ada compilers. Any/all statistics will be helpful; if information on stmts/elapsed minute, stmts/CPU minute, HW/OS & compiler, and aprox. volume of code can be supplied that would be terrific. I'll send a summary to the net (without indications of origin of specific stats, of course). Thanks! Chuck Howell MITRE, Mail Stop Z-645 7525 Colshire Drive McLean, VA 22102-3481 howell@community-chest.mitre.org