From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e3feb606f668a7c1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 based RTOS
Date: 2000/02/22
Message-ID: <88umb5$c5p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 588490199
References: <88ilp7$bcm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38ADCA44.3B91BF6F@averstar.com>
 <88qli0$gvr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38B2A2A1.FDCDDFE7@honeywell.com>
 <88ugrd$7j7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x22.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 22 18:59:53 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-02-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <88ugrd$7j7$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  xaplos@my-deja.com wrote:

> how Ada is superior to C/C++ in design and safety. I'm currious if
> someone can explain why there are so many RTOS based on C/C++ and
> "none" (I mean easily and freely available) based on Ada. With Ada's

How many RTOS's are there in *any* language that fit your criteria? Two
maybe? The fact that you can't easily find freely-available sources for
a particular language for either of those two RTOS's can hardly be taken
as having some statisticly significant meaning.

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.