From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.166.35 with SMTP id f23mr5484704yhl.22.1377530627064; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.73.132 with SMTP id l4mr355530igv.0.1377530626852; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!feeder2-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder02.blueworldhosting.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!q10no935719qai.0!news-out.google.com!he10ni3465qab.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no4854194qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:23:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=RxNzCgoAAACA5KmgtFQuaU-WaH7rjnAO NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 References: <87mwoastdi.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <9d7e5c6c-aeb9-4ac1-a7b0-c048061ae4c6@googlegroups.com> <87zjsar72v.fsf@nl106-137-194.student.uu.se> <2860f114-06c4-42a3-80ac-1c24b631b135@googlegroups.com> <5215d0f8$0$9508$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <52165997$0$9514$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <831d17f2-f93e-4e53-b124-a0b0bcd61838@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <88f434c2-5d13-4f35-a407-192c28d21070@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: RTS graph and "temporal formulas" From: Adam Beneschan Injection-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:23:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Bytes: 2862 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183137 Date: 2013-08-26T08:23:46-07:00 List-Id: On Sunday, August 25, 2013 3:22:25 AM UTC-7, AdaMagica wrote: > On Friday, August 23, 2013 3:52:19 PM UTC+2, Shark8 wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > > Come now, there's perfectly good uses for Caps-Lock, like writing secti= on headers in your code: >=20 > >=20 >=20 > > ---------------------------------------- >=20 > > -- CONSTANTS -- >=20 > > ---------------------------------------- >=20 >=20 >=20 > Well, this isn't Pascal, or is it. You normally don't write first types, = then constants, then variables. I know that there are (or have been) Ada shops with style requirements for = things to be grouped together like this, where possible. If you have an or= ganization where people have to read each other's code, without an IDE or s= omething like that, I can understand why it might be a good idea. -- Adam