From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2cdc6c2ee911fe77
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: gdb question, was Re: Ada vs. C++
Date: 2000/02/15
Message-ID: <88boc6$enk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 585980565
References: <88a775$gsq$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>
 <PI1q4.4873$yt2.142554@nnrp3-w.snfc21.pbi.net>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x27.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 15 14:37:57 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Date: 2000-02-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <PI1q4.4873$yt2.142554@nnrp3-w.snfc21.pbi.net>,
  tmoran@bix.com wrote:
> >It has a lot to do with the quality of the Ada compilers and
> >associated tools, especially debugging tools.
>   I recently needed, for the first time, to use gdb.  It seemed
> non-obvious and extremely klutzy.  Is that just my unfamiliarity,
> or does that match others' observation?

GDB itself, yes I agree. GDBTK on the other hand is quite nice.

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.